Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to Building a high speed network makes even more sense if you've got a big-ass country to get around in.

Relatively low population density makes high speed trains unviable in the US...

except in the very dense eastern corridor. Face it, Amtrak has lost billions year after year on their long distance service because they can't charge enough to make a profit. The last time I looked, Amtrak tickets cost as much or more than airline tickets for similar trips, so who other than railroad buffs and those afraid of flying would take a train instead of a plane?

Installing the necessary infrastructure for high speed train service would cost many billion dollars. Buying, operating, and maintain high speed trains is not cheap. If you've ever driven across the US as I have many times, you'll remember that there's a hell of a lot of empty space in America. By way of comparison, France is roughy 4/5ths the size of Texax (~211,000 square miles [545,630 sq km]verses 260,000 square miles) with a population of 60 million, according to the <a href="http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/fr.html>CIA World Fact Book. By way of comparison, the US has an area of 9,629,091 sq km and a population of a bit over 290 million. Even subtracting Alaska and Hawaii, the US about 15 times the size of France with a population less than 6 times as great, meaning the population density is much lower.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (45 posts)