"Might be a bit shrill, but this is part of the pattern"
Hmm, so whereas the democrats do this sometimes, whats your excuse for doing it all of the time? Your always the one telling me 'what I'm after'...
Notice I have never made any hey out of the deserter issue, so you hand-waving dismissal is disingenuous in this case. Sort of like the dishonest for-the-sake-of-winning rhetoric you have been displaying here for the past 6 months.
And my point stands- with respect to Clarke I have seen nothing from you but ignorance of the source material at question and recycled attacks from yesterday episode of O'Reilly or Hannity and Colmes
So have you read the transcript of Clarkes testimony: if so, when? Be honest. Have you perused his book- at least skimmed it? Discussed it in depth with someone who has read it? Be honest!
The very fact that you have painfully skirted replying on this issue gives me reason to believe that I knw what the answer is.
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to Not a flame, as such.
LOL
The whole thread (56 posts)
- Seven new NATO members
- It should have zero members.
- re: Seven new NATO members
- Your own post says it all.
- re: Your own post says it all.
- PS We do have a flame board.
- What's your hurry?
- Brass tacks
- Rusty Nails
- Donors pledge $4.4 bln to Afghanistan this year [Link]
- Use of Denial tactic No.1
- No deal, sparky
- re: No deal, sparky
- How about answering some of *my* questions?
- Arguing for argument's sake?
- Well, a simple "No, Davin, I'm not going to answer any questions that would have me back up my narrow, misleading and selectively quotes statistics" would suffice
- oh, and BTW
- Arguing for argument's sake?
- How about answering some of *my* questions?
- re: No deal, sparky
- No deal, sparky
- Rusty Nails
- Whatta maroon
- re: Your own post says it all.
- Your own post says it all.
