The questions you ignored:
So are you denying that Afghanistan is a mess outside of a small area around Kabul?
What was the total (we will use THAT figure since you trotted out the nacent 4.4 bln) international aid contribution to Afghanistan pre-9/11? Not US aid- but total.
And while your at it, are you actually proud of that 1.5 bln figure from the US?
"Looks like the US attacking the Taliban was a Goddamn monetary windfall for Afghanistan. What the heck are you complaining about? Afghanistan being rebuilt on "Bush's watch"?
"
If the world was as simple as you paint it... But its not.
Why don't you actually look into thisinstead of trying to win an argument with me? I mean seriously, Afghanistan is NOT a model state right now. There is a reason afghanistan is the worlds largest suplier of raw opium currently (and its even up fro the pre-invasion Taliban days!)). And its not that they are all well off enough and stable enough to take up poppy growing as a hobby.
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to re: No deal, sparky
How about answering some of *my* questions?
The whole thread (56 posts)
- Seven new NATO members
- It should have zero members.
- re: Seven new NATO members
- Your own post says it all.
- re: Your own post says it all.
- PS We do have a flame board.
- What's your hurry?
- Brass tacks
- Rusty Nails
- Donors pledge $4.4 bln to Afghanistan this year [Link]
- Use of Denial tactic No.1
- No deal, sparky
- re: No deal, sparky
- How about answering some of *my* questions?
- Arguing for argument's sake?
- Well, a simple "No, Davin, I'm not going to answer any questions that would have me back up my narrow, misleading and selectively quotes statistics" would suffice
- oh, and BTW
- Arguing for argument's sake?
- How about answering some of *my* questions?
- re: No deal, sparky
- No deal, sparky
- Rusty Nails
- Whatta maroon
- re: Your own post says it all.
- Your own post says it all.
