And add into that: "And I am going to honestly believe that you can build up a country of millions and forestall their descent into uneducated sectarian extremism on a budget of 1.5 bln from america and 4.4 bln total!!"
Why should we give Iraq, who is in far better shape, 10 times that- if good ol' Afghanistan needs only 4 bln? Hmm? I wonder...
But, maybe again, you'll come around another day. Last I checked, you eventually came around with the Iraq-is-threat and WMD thing- and it only took several thousand corpses and an indefinite occupation of another civilization!
But far better than abandoning your beliefs to a m-f liberal, right? I mean I have to be wrong for this world to operate, right?
I direct you here
Please, keep the faith! (because I shure as hell don't want it!)
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to Arguing for argument's sake?
Well, a simple "No, Davin, I'm not going to answer any questions that would have me back up my narrow, misleading and selectively quotes statistics" would suffice
The whole thread (56 posts)
- Seven new NATO members
- It should have zero members.
- re: Seven new NATO members
- Your own post says it all.
- re: Your own post says it all.
- PS We do have a flame board.
- What's your hurry?
- Brass tacks
- Rusty Nails
- Donors pledge $4.4 bln to Afghanistan this year [Link]
- Use of Denial tactic No.1
- No deal, sparky
- re: No deal, sparky
- How about answering some of *my* questions?
- Arguing for argument's sake?
- Well, a simple "No, Davin, I'm not going to answer any questions that would have me back up my narrow, misleading and selectively quotes statistics" would suffice
- oh, and BTW
- Arguing for argument's sake?
- How about answering some of *my* questions?
- re: No deal, sparky
- No deal, sparky
- Rusty Nails
- Whatta maroon
- re: Your own post says it all.
- Your own post says it all.
