I'd simply like to hear a valid rationale for calling Saddam a "murderer" . . .
. . . when his killings were probably legal according to Iraqi law at the time.
Removing Saddam may have been a short-term positive, but it remains to be seen if it was a positive development over the long run.
If Iraq becomes an Islamic theocracy aligned with Iran and becomes a rabidly anti-American supporter of al Qaeda, will you still see the removal of Saddam as positive?
