Explain to me how you believe Clinton's most excellent decisions allowed inspectors to be kicked out of Iraq.
Explain to me why you think it was wise to tolerate that when Clinton thought Saddam was hiding WMD and intended to make more.
Explain to me how Clinton's surgical strikes were so effective on Al-queida since it continued to grow throughout the 90s.
Explain to me how Carter's policies had lightly armed Iranian students quaking in their boots.
Explain to me why I shouldn't ROTFL at your remarks. I watched these events unfold closely and formed my opinions on the sorry impact of those two before GW Bush ever announced his run for his first term. The Democrats are cruising for a worse bruising with these denial attempts which refuse to face facts and blame the voters choice on their "lack of understanding" or gullibility rather than on the Democratic parties own obvious past failures to address security and terrorism issues.
Regards,
Mark
Current Events » in reply to Your 20/20 hindsight is at once both remarkable and revisionist. Keep it up!
Really?
The whole thread (64 posts)
- expect more crap like this under our 'god fearing' president...
- Yeah It Really Sucks
- Our True Believers believe anything. Their "reality" is based on precisely that sort of underpinning. (n/t)
- Is the fundie creation myth less valid than the Indian creation myth?
- Geez, so don't buy the damn book.
- Damn the book. DAMN IT!
- "...should the NPS be 'honoring' this aspect of religion?"
- False advertizing
- re: False advertising
- False advertizing
- "...should the NPS be 'honoring' this aspect of religion?"
- Damn the book. DAMN IT!
- re:Ah, memories!!
