What don't you get about freedom of religion? All religions are supposed to be tolerated. A religion that seeks dominance and to enforce it's belief system on all violates that principle not those who preach strange beliefs. I see no problem however in condeming both those that preach intolerance and those that preach hatred. I will agree that the many of those fighting Christian intolerance seem less focused on minority intolerance, but the intolerance of the majority would seem to be a bigger threat to constitutional principles than the intolerance of a minority.
Personally I think freedom of speech should not protect incitement to criminal violence, but then again the British didn't care much for it either in the late 1700s.
Regards,
Mark
Current Events » in reply to re: False Motive
Can I Have Another Softball?
The whole thread (64 posts)
- expect more crap like this under our 'god fearing' president...
- Yeah It Really Sucks
- Our True Believers believe anything. Their "reality" is based on precisely that sort of underpinning. (n/t)
- Is the fundie creation myth less valid than the Indian creation myth?
- Geez, so don't buy the damn book.
- Damn the book. DAMN IT!
- "...should the NPS be 'honoring' this aspect of religion?"
- False advertizing
- re: False advertising
- False advertizing
- "...should the NPS be 'honoring' this aspect of religion?"
- Damn the book. DAMN IT!
- re:Ah, memories!!
