How politically moronic. Votes are always cast based on the dominant issues. A vote for Bush is not automatically a vote for creationism. My point was if you want to beat Bush on more minor issues you need to beat him on the major ones. Such points are often hard to make with ivory tower types though. The only reason the choice you laid out had to be made was because your party chose a candidate perceived as weak on defense. It most certainly is not a choice that should have to be made and it reflects poorly on you that you would assume I would ever hold such a view.
My point was that I share your concern, but you are rather silly to berate a technically literate crowd for predominantly supporting Bush based on this issue.
Regards,
Mark
Current Events » in reply to And this is related to 9-11 in what way?
As For You In Post Comments
The whole thread (64 posts)
- expect more crap like this under our 'god fearing' president...
- Yeah It Really Sucks
- Our True Believers believe anything. Their "reality" is based on precisely that sort of underpinning. (n/t)
- Is the fundie creation myth less valid than the Indian creation myth?
- Geez, so don't buy the damn book.
- Damn the book. DAMN IT!
- "...should the NPS be 'honoring' this aspect of religion?"
- False advertizing
- re: False advertising
- False advertizing
- "...should the NPS be 'honoring' this aspect of religion?"
- Damn the book. DAMN IT!
- re:Ah, memories!!
