Like whoa dude, far out!
Why we (our govt) spend ANY time and money prohibiting such usages amazes me
Current Events » in reply to Medical marijuana before the Supreme Court again
The whole thread (38 posts)
- Medical marijuana before the Supreme Court again
- As I've said before, I'm for legalization, but against any government sponsership of addiction services.
- The question is: Does the state have any legitmate interest in controlling dope use at all?
- You're confusing the issues: this is about mdeical practice, not about recerational use
- No confussion at all.
- A lot of people are deeply insulted by your remarks
- Once again, it's already legal. It's called Marinol.
- Once again, you're insulting, and Marinol is known not to be as effective
- Why grow it for free when one has the opportunity to enrich the pharm industry? (n/t)
- Once again, it's already legal. It's called Marinol.
- A lot of people are deeply insulted by your remarks
- this keyboard inversion is driving me batty: read "medical", "recreational"
- No confussion at all.
- And a drunk society is worse. The US is a violent society.
- You're confusing the issues: this is about mdeical practice, not about recerational use
- Like whoa dude, far out!
- Drug prohibition is an idiotic policy that has failed from the start, and will continue to fail. (n/t)
- The so called "War on Drugs" like the "War on Terrorism" ignore the realities of each and are failures both.....
- Pack up the skis and head for Hades! I agree with DFM! (n/t)
- Yet another in a nearly infinite list of things that shouldn't be a Federal problem. (n/t)
- read "send" for "sent" (n/t)