It is YOU who characterizes an opposing viewpoint as the "noise machine", thereby impugning the value of the statements. So, does that mean you're a clone of Michael Moore? Should I simply answer your points and other like viewpoints by simply saying you're MM parrots?
The executive has made declarations under the Patriot Act. When I last looked it was AGAIN passed by a substantial majority of the legislature. Let me know if I'm wrong. And no, I don't support everything in the act. There are ludicrous items and in other aspects it does not go far enough for wartime.
Yes, I read the link and borrowed the phrase from it. I admit that some Dartmouth Law grads sometimes have something useful to say.
As to MA judiciary they are appointed, not elected. No recall. Of course the judiciary is ruling on its ideology. On what other basis do you sugest they're ruling? Certainly not on popular referendae, not that that's their charter.
-p
Current Events » in reply to So you're a *senior* member of the Republican noise machine? Sorry, Mr. O'Reilly, I didn't know!
re: So you're a *senior* member of the Republican noise machine? Sorry, Mr. O'Reilly, I didn't know!
The whole thread (36 posts)
- What liberals really want
- The attack on the judiciary goes on.
- re: The attack on the judiciary goes on.
- Checks and balances applies to judges, too
- Here's the problem: "done other things that large segments of the public disagree with"
- Alternative : pass better laws (n/t)
- re: What liberals really want
- The attack on the judiciary goes on.