Dodged?

tony — 4/22/2005 1:21:27 AM (archived)

Dodged what?

BTW it was constitutional the week before, only because the Court hadn't ruled.

BTW (2), now they are POWs?
Hadn't you better tell Rumsfeld?
When are hostilitis over and when is Geneva to be applied?

The whole thread (36 posts)

What liberals really want - phil - 4/19/2005 7:03:06 PM
- The attack on the judiciary goes on. - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:49:52 AM
  - re: The attack on the judiciary goes on. - phil - 4/20/2005 2:33:38 PM
    - So you're a *senior* member of the Republican noise machine? Sorry, Mr. O'Reilly, I didn't know! - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:28:54 PM
      - Ideology - Tom Brosz - 4/21/2005 6:11:31 AM
        
        re: Ideology explained - Mary Anne - 4/22/2005 1:51:07 PM
      - re: So you're a *senior* member of the Republican noise machine? Sorry, Mr. O'Reilly, I didn't know! - phil - 4/21/2005 1:45:27 AM
        
        It *is* a noise machine. It's a form of news reporting predicated on yelling. - Mary Anne - 4/22/2005 1:31:01 PM
        
        So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks? - DL - 4/21/2005 9:36:11 PM
        
        re: So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks? - p - 4/22/2005 1:00:10 AM
        
        No defensivenes there... Yup... The P doeth obviously not protest too much - DL - 4/22/2005 4:43:27 AM
  - Checks and balances applies to judges, too - Larry J - 4/20/2005 1:02:04 PM
    - Here's the problem: "done other things that large segments of the public disagree with" - alcaray - 4/20/2005 6:03:49 PM
      - "Conservatives have the ability to whip up an angry mob every time they disagree with a court case." - Larry J - 4/20/2005 7:25:49 PM
        
        If you think you are being treated unfairly then - alcaray - 4/20/2005 8:25:20 PM
        
        And what do we do when the courts are the problem? - Larry J - 4/21/2005 3:09:05 AM
        
        When it happens, I'll let you know. (n/t) - alcaray - 4/21/2005 4:17:04 PM
        
        Criticism of one branch of government aint the problem. - Tony - 4/20/2005 7:56:48 PM
        
        Check Article 1, Section 8 - Larry J - 4/21/2005 3:06:23 AM
        
        re: Check Article 1, Section 8 - Tony - 4/21/2005 2:15:26 PM
        
        And the Congress provides checks for the judges - Larry J - 4/21/2005 5:52:24 PM
        
        You can keep writing the same post for as long as you like. - Tony - 4/21/2005 6:12:47 PM
    - Alternative : pass better laws (n/t) - Tony - 4/20/2005 4:36:00 PM
- re: What liberals really want - LJ - 4/19/2005 8:42:28 PM
  - re: What liberals really want - p - 4/19/2005 11:25:30 PM
    - Can you cite some "constitution flouting" examples? (n/t) - alcaray - 4/20/2005 5:50:02 PM
    - Visit Guantanamo. See the world. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:40:57 AM
    - "Cite specific examples " - which is easy. Would you admit you are a True Believer? - Bowser - 4/20/2005 3:29:49 AM
      - re: "Cite specific examples " - which is easy. Would you admit you are a True Believer? - p - 4/20/2005 1:48:11 PM
        
        Cite specific examples - Yasser Hamdi super-secret indefinite detention. Next? (n/t) - Tony - 4/20/2005 4:42:02 PM
        
        Yeah, yeah. Want to try for two? - Tom Brosz - 4/21/2005 6:16:41 AM
        
        Sure.... here ya go! Violations of justice and human rights - R.L. - 4/22/2005 6:32:53 AM
        
        Oh I'm sorry - Tony - 4/21/2005 2:11:52 PM
        
        Big deal. - Tom Brosz - 4/22/2005 12:41:54 AM
        
        Dodged? - tony - 4/22/2005 1:21:27 AM
        
        Oh yeah, name three then. - SDG - 4/21/2005 2:45:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (36 posts)