re: So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks?

Current Events » in reply to So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks?

re: So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks?

p — 4/22/2005 1:00:10 AM (archived)

CLUE:
Uh, because it's a CURRENT EVENT, i.e. recent NEWS. There WAS no history. The "constitutional convention" is a recent phenom.

-p (supplier of clues for the truely clueless)

The whole thread (36 posts)

What liberals really want - phil - 4/19/2005 7:03:06 PM
- The attack on the judiciary goes on. - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:49:52 AM
  - re: The attack on the judiciary goes on. - phil - 4/20/2005 2:33:38 PM
    - So you're a *senior* member of the Republican noise machine? Sorry, Mr. O'Reilly, I didn't know! - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:28:54 PM
      - Ideology - Tom Brosz - 4/21/2005 6:11:31 AM
        
        re: Ideology explained - Mary Anne - 4/22/2005 1:51:07 PM
      - re: So you're a *senior* member of the Republican noise machine? Sorry, Mr. O'Reilly, I didn't know! - phil - 4/21/2005 1:45:27 AM
        
        It *is* a noise machine. It's a form of news reporting predicated on yelling. - Mary Anne - 4/22/2005 1:31:01 PM
        
        So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks? - DL - 4/21/2005 9:36:11 PM
        
        re: So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks? - p - 4/22/2005 1:00:10 AM
        
        No defensivenes there... Yup... The P doeth obviously not protest too much - DL - 4/22/2005 4:43:27 AM
  - Checks and balances applies to judges, too - Larry J - 4/20/2005 1:02:04 PM
    - Here's the problem: "done other things that large segments of the public disagree with" - alcaray - 4/20/2005 6:03:49 PM
      - "Conservatives have the ability to whip up an angry mob every time they disagree with a court case." - Larry J - 4/20/2005 7:25:49 PM
        
        If you think you are being treated unfairly then - alcaray - 4/20/2005 8:25:20 PM
        
        And what do we do when the courts are the problem? - Larry J - 4/21/2005 3:09:05 AM
        
        When it happens, I'll let you know. (n/t) - alcaray - 4/21/2005 4:17:04 PM
        
        Criticism of one branch of government aint the problem. - Tony - 4/20/2005 7:56:48 PM
        
        Check Article 1, Section 8 - Larry J - 4/21/2005 3:06:23 AM
        
        re: Check Article 1, Section 8 - Tony - 4/21/2005 2:15:26 PM
        
        And the Congress provides checks for the judges - Larry J - 4/21/2005 5:52:24 PM
        
        You can keep writing the same post for as long as you like. - Tony - 4/21/2005 6:12:47 PM
    - Alternative : pass better laws (n/t) - Tony - 4/20/2005 4:36:00 PM
- re: What liberals really want - LJ - 4/19/2005 8:42:28 PM
  - re: What liberals really want - p - 4/19/2005 11:25:30 PM
    - Can you cite some "constitution flouting" examples? (n/t) - alcaray - 4/20/2005 5:50:02 PM
    - Visit Guantanamo. See the world. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:40:57 AM
    - "Cite specific examples " - which is easy. Would you admit you are a True Believer? - Bowser - 4/20/2005 3:29:49 AM
      - re: "Cite specific examples " - which is easy. Would you admit you are a True Believer? - p - 4/20/2005 1:48:11 PM
        
        Cite specific examples - Yasser Hamdi super-secret indefinite detention. Next? (n/t) - Tony - 4/20/2005 4:42:02 PM
        
        Yeah, yeah. Want to try for two? - Tom Brosz - 4/21/2005 6:16:41 AM
        
        Sure.... here ya go! Violations of justice and human rights - R.L. - 4/22/2005 6:32:53 AM
        
        Oh I'm sorry - Tony - 4/21/2005 2:11:52 PM
        
        Big deal. - Tom Brosz - 4/22/2005 12:41:54 AM
        
        Dodged? - tony - 4/22/2005 1:21:27 AM
        
        Oh yeah, name three then. - SDG - 4/21/2005 2:45:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (36 posts)