Current Events » in reply to "Conservatives have the ability to whip up an angry mob every time they disagree with a court case."

The whole thread (36 posts)

• What liberals really want - phil - 4/19/2005 7:03:06 PM
  • The attack on the judiciary goes on. - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:49:52 AM
    • re: The attack on the judiciary goes on. - phil - 4/20/2005 2:33:38 PM
      • So you're a *senior* member of the Republican noise machine? Sorry, Mr. O'Reilly, I didn't know! - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:28:54 PM
        • Ideology - Tom Brosz - 4/21/2005 6:11:31 AM
          • re: Ideology explained - Mary Anne - 4/22/2005 1:51:07 PM
        • re: So you're a *senior* member of the Republican noise machine? Sorry, Mr. O'Reilly, I didn't know! - phil - 4/21/2005 1:45:27 AM
          • It *is* a noise machine. It's a form of news reporting predicated on yelling. - Mary Anne - 4/22/2005 1:31:01 PM
          • So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks? - DL - 4/21/2005 9:36:11 PM
            • re: So, why didn't you care about this until the last few weeks? - p - 4/22/2005 1:00:10 AM
              • No defensivenes there... Yup... The P doeth obviously not protest too much - DL - 4/22/2005 4:43:27 AM
    • Checks and balances applies to judges, too - Larry J - 4/20/2005 1:02:04 PM
      • Here's the problem: "done other things that large segments of the public disagree with" - alcaray - 4/20/2005 6:03:49 PM
        • "Conservatives have the ability to whip up an angry mob every time they disagree with a court case." - Larry J - 4/20/2005 7:25:49 PM
          • If you think you are being treated unfairly then - alcaray - 4/20/2005 8:25:20 PM
            • And what do we do when the courts are the problem? - Larry J - 4/21/2005 3:09:05 AM
              • When it happens, I'll let you know. (n/t) - alcaray - 4/21/2005 4:17:04 PM
          • Criticism of one branch of government aint the problem. - Tony - 4/20/2005 7:56:48 PM
            • Check Article 1, Section 8 - Larry J - 4/21/2005 3:06:23 AM
              • re: Check Article 1, Section 8 - Tony - 4/21/2005 2:15:26 PM
                • And the Congress provides checks for the judges - Larry J - 4/21/2005 5:52:24 PM
                  • You can keep writing the same post for as long as you like. - Tony - 4/21/2005 6:12:47 PM
      • Alternative : pass better laws (n/t) - Tony - 4/20/2005 4:36:00 PM
  • re: What liberals really want - LJ - 4/19/2005 8:42:28 PM
    • re: What liberals really want - p - 4/19/2005 11:25:30 PM
      • Can you cite some "constitution flouting" examples? (n/t) - alcaray - 4/20/2005 5:50:02 PM
      • Visit Guantanamo. See the world. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 4/20/2005 10:40:57 AM
      • "Cite specific examples " - which is easy. Would you admit you are a True Believer? - Bowser - 4/20/2005 3:29:49 AM
        • re: "Cite specific examples " - which is easy. Would you admit you are a True Believer? - p - 4/20/2005 1:48:11 PM
          • Cite specific examples - Yasser Hamdi super-secret indefinite detention. Next? (n/t) - Tony - 4/20/2005 4:42:02 PM
            • Yeah, yeah. Want to try for two? - Tom Brosz - 4/21/2005 6:16:41 AM
              • Sure.... here ya go! Violations of justice and human rights - R.L. - 4/22/2005 6:32:53 AM
              • Oh I'm sorry - Tony - 4/21/2005 2:11:52 PM
                • Big deal. - Tom Brosz - 4/22/2005 12:41:54 AM
                  • Dodged? - tony - 4/22/2005 1:21:27 AM
                • Oh yeah, name three then. - SDG - 4/21/2005 2:45:00 PM