And liberals have a way of turning to the courts to overturn elections they disagree with, e.g. the governor's race in Washington state.
Judges seem to have a funny view of constitutionality. For example, consider free speech as defined by the First Amendment. Based on recent court rulings, they've made it more protected in some circumstances to spread pornography than political speech. Thanks a lot, John McCain.
If we want to avoid tyranny, no one branch of government can be exempt from criticism, checks and balances. Judges are no better than anyone else. Lord Acton's adage applies to them just the same as anyone else, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Current Events » in reply to Here's the problem: "done other things that large segments of the public disagree with"
"Conservatives have the ability to whip up an angry mob every time they disagree with a court case."
The whole thread (36 posts)
- What liberals really want
- The attack on the judiciary goes on.
- re: The attack on the judiciary goes on.
- Checks and balances applies to judges, too
- Here's the problem: "done other things that large segments of the public disagree with"
- Alternative : pass better laws (n/t)
- re: What liberals really want
- The attack on the judiciary goes on.
