The vertical scale could have been from 0 to 1,000,000 ppm and the graph would display only a straight horizontal line. would that have been better?
The fact is the data shows a rapid 20% increase in CO2 levels that is temporally correlated with anthropogenic CO2 production- that is the important fact.
I worked on an experiment looking at the energies of electrons ejected in laser induced ionization. Much of what was important about the data would not show up on a linear-linear plot. However when plotted on a log/linear graph it was clear that some electrons had energies in excess of what some theories predicted. So was presenting my data on a log/linear plot dishonest, or just common sense?
You are a scientist Nick... You should know better.
Space/Science » in reply to DO you think people would get excited if you showed them THIS graph?
don't be silly, Nick
The whole thread (54 posts)
- Anthropogenic CO2.
- Human flatulence.
- More propaganda from those biased eco-whackos at NASA, and Columbia University, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and....
- DO you think people would get excited if you showed them THIS graph?
- What I really don't understand
- R.L.s original post.
- re: Anthropogenic CO2.
- Thank You
- re: Anthropogenic CO2.
- There is nothing dishonest about using that graph
- What makes that graph intellectually dishonest? (n/t)
- Whats the point, its not like people like Scott want the facts
