It's not a huge change. It's Parts per Million.
WHY dont you educate yourself on this topic before making a fool of yourself? Data posted by Tom, ET and I all show that changes of parts per million affect temperature- do you have trouble reading the data?
It's good we don't have a record of greenhouse gas for Mars, otherwise RL would be claiming it proves there is an advanced Martian civilization.
Absolutely incorrect, asinine and irrelavent- what the hell does mars have to do with Earth's biosphere in this respect?
The exact causual relationship between CO2 and global warming is not known.
BULLSHIT! Look at the data! Positive correlation between CO2 levels and temperature are shown in the empiracal data. We also understand the science as to why this is the case. Dont try bullshitting me- dont assuume that because you cant read scientific data and understand it that the rest of us suffer from your affliction...
Your house could be said to be sensitive to increased CO2 levels- or it's designed to keep warm or cold gas in. Having people in a house will increase the CO2 levels. Because of it's nature arctic areas are also sensitive CO2 increases. Normally arctic areas are lower in CO2 content than other regions. The soviets with there huge build up industrial centers in northern parts of the country have had much larger affect of the local CO2 than if these same cities were in more temperate regions.
This is relavent in what way? Other than demonstrating you cant coherently convey your point I see no relavence.
CO2 levels are a dynamic element it can no way be described as static and steadly increasing quanitity. And yes their are "magical sinks" everywhere and we don't understand this very throughly. The ocean is one the biggest magical sinks, forests are another, weather systems another. This magical thing has build hundreds of miles of underground tunnels- for an example of how *magical* it is:)
Please explain why your magical sinks are shown to be unable to keep up.... are you expecting 'god' to suddenly turn them on to save us?
Space/Science » in reply to re: Another lame argument
re: Another lame argument
The whole thread (54 posts)
- Anthropogenic CO2.
- Human flatulence.
- More propaganda from those biased eco-whackos at NASA, and Columbia University, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and....
- DO you think people would get excited if you showed them THIS graph?
- What I really don't understand
- R.L.s original post.
- re: Anthropogenic CO2.
- Thank You
- re: Anthropogenic CO2.
- There is nothing dishonest about using that graph
- What makes that graph intellectually dishonest? (n/t)
- Whats the point, its not like people like Scott want the facts
