They just want to mouth the words they are fed and make fun of those that have actually looked into the science deeply enough to know that there IS a problem.
For instance I have posted the isotopic data that PROVES that the increased CO2 cannot possibly be due to volcanism, yet here again Scott is making that tired claim. Does he actually look at the science? No, he doesnt need to- he has some political hack to do his thinking for him. All he needs to do is regurgitate the words he is fed. Its so much more fun to make fun of those that actually educate themselves on the subject.
I have also posted that the increase is in line with what you would expect given the quantities of CO2 we are dumping into the atmosphere, yet some- like typical pseudoscientists- prefer to ignore that fact and claim that some other unknown mechanism is responsible...
Quite frankly, I give up. For some reason certain people are either too stupid or lazy to look at the facts. The Fact is increasing CO2 is due to human actions and is warming our planet. You can argue about how big a disaster this will lead to, but you cant argue that this is 'natural', or due to volcanism.
Space/Science » in reply to Anthropogenic CO2.
Whats the point, its not like people like Scott want the facts
The whole thread (54 posts)
- Anthropogenic CO2.
- Human flatulence.
- More propaganda from those biased eco-whackos at NASA, and Columbia University, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and....
- DO you think people would get excited if you showed them THIS graph?
- What I really don't understand
- R.L.s original post.
- re: Anthropogenic CO2.
- Thank You
- re: Anthropogenic CO2.
- There is nothing dishonest about using that graph
- What makes that graph intellectually dishonest? (n/t)
- Whats the point, its not like people like Scott want the facts