I'll call your bluff

Current Events » in reply to You don't get it.

I'll call your bluff

Tony — 11/5/2005 3:12:19 AM (archived)

"I am on record on many issues as having strong disagreements with his policies, and I like to think you remember them well enough that I don't have to lay them out."

I think I know you as well as anyone online, and I can only think of one substantive area where you and Bush differ. That is of course the spending of the current government.
I have seen little else in the way of complaint. Care to correct me?

The whole thread (45 posts)

The Awakening - Bowser - 11/4/2005 7:00:25 AM
- re: The Awakening - REB - 11/4/2005 1:06:23 PM
  - The Party line - Robert - 11/4/2005 6:28:13 PM
    - You mean Nixon wasn't framed? (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/6/2005 1:57:03 AM
      - Don't tease, Techie - Robert - 11/6/2005 5:36:19 PM
        
        Sorry. - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/6/2005 8:05:44 PM
        
        Interesting - Robert - 11/6/2005 10:54:48 PM
        
        Haven't you seen him playing Piano for Lauren Bacall? - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/6/2005 11:10:45 PM
    - You don't get it. - Tom Brosz - 11/4/2005 8:04:37 PM
      - I'll call your bluff - Tony - 11/5/2005 3:12:19 AM
        
        Okay, other than spending.... - Tom Brosz - 11/5/2005 3:33:42 AM
        
        Bookmark for next time someone accuses you of being a Bushbot (n/t) - Sam F. - 1/11/2006 3:20:59 AM
        
        Well they did do the roads.... - tony - 11/5/2005 5:10:05 PM
        
        tariffs (n/t) - FrankC - 11/5/2005 3:15:44 AM
        
        Ah nuts, forgot immigration. We're up to two. (n/t) - Tony - 11/5/2005 3:13:28 AM
      - To some degree - Robert - 11/4/2005 10:43:08 PM
        
        Defending - Tom Brosz - 11/5/2005 3:55:34 AM
        
        Huh?? - Lindy - 11/7/2005 5:29:37 AM
        
        re: Defending Nixon? - Robert - 11/6/2005 5:32:20 PM
        
        Sorry, Robert. - Tom Brosz - 11/7/2005 12:47:10 AM
    - I understand what you are saying. - REB - 11/4/2005 7:42:56 PM
      - OK - Robert - 11/4/2005 8:55:58 PM
        
        For the record, I'm spokesman for nobody but me. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/4/2005 9:20:14 PM
        
        I'll second that - gbaikie - 11/5/2005 1:08:10 AM
        
        Yes and no - FrankC - 11/4/2005 11:28:48 PM
        
        That was intended as a compliment, Tom. (n/t) - Robert - 11/4/2005 10:44:01 PM
        
        I know. It came out more abrupt than I intended. Sorry. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/5/2005 3:30:56 AM
        
        Don't be modest. - Bowser - 11/4/2005 9:38:36 PM
        
        And who are you spokesman for? - Tom Brosz - 11/4/2005 9:47:36 PM
        
        re: OK - REB - 11/4/2005 9:09:35 PM
        
        re: OK - Robert - 11/4/2005 11:04:46 PM
        
        Excellent post Robert S. - SDG - 11/7/2005 8:20:08 PM
    - re: The Party line - REB - 11/4/2005 7:05:04 PM
  - Excuses - Donald - 11/4/2005 2:57:34 PM
    - re: Excuses - REB - 11/4/2005 3:46:00 PM
      - re: Who's the enemy? - Raoul - 11/4/2005 4:59:27 PM
        
        Raoul.......... - Lindy - 11/6/2005 6:00:51 PM
        
        Afraid you're going to find out the hard way in a few years. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/4/2005 6:36:15 PM
        
        A few years? - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/6/2005 2:00:53 AM
        
        No. - Tom Brosz - 11/6/2005 2:32:23 AM
        
        I don't keep up with the French laws... - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/6/2005 4:14:59 AM
        
        re: Who's the enemy? - REB - 11/4/2005 5:08:59 PM
        
        REB......... - Lindy - 11/6/2005 6:06:05 PM
    - re: Excuses - REB - 11/4/2005 3:26:08 PM
- Polls - Tom Brosz - 11/4/2005 7:11:42 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (45 posts)