Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: 1/10th refers to per-capita emissions

I said, "one-tenth or smaller than that of the US"

I don't have exact figures, I expect some are more and most less than that. The point is that a fair allocation of emissions would be on a per-capita basis, not a simple reduction from everyone's 1990 levels.

FWIW, I think the per-capita limit should be allocated proportionately to 1980 population levels, when global warming theory was obviously correct - and migrants take their allocation with them.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (29 posts)