Chris, you hand me a poll that indicates that public support for continuing with the ISS as ISS is around 70%, and claim that it does nothing of the sort.
You comment on a poll that indicates that support for manned Moon is far higher than for manned Mars, and claim that it supports manned Mars.
You support commercial space prizes, but let loose a string of insults at the suggestion they be used for Mars exploration.
The results of internet polls reflect the participants: a poll on a space site is preo-space, but a poll on a general news site is likely to be more accurate, allowing for the biases of net users.
None of the pollsters have ever polled on planetary defense, and how much people want that.
Before you go off again, it would help if you talked with some people who have absolutely no interest in space sometime.
Space/Science » in reply to re: "move on" to what?
Both the lack of awrareness of reality and the faulty logic are stunning
The whole thread (48 posts)
- Shuttle shutdown savings?: Griffin or Zubrin
- Rarely works that way
- The Difference
- PS
- "Start with different requirements and you will end with different solutions."
- re: "Start with different requirements and you will end with different solutions."
- "Start with different requirements and you will end with different solutions."
- PS
- neither one has a clue
- re: Shuttle shutdown savings?: Griffin or Zubrin
- re: Shuttle shutdown savings?: Griffin or Zubrin
