re: 3,000 km/h ? – Space/Science – HabitableZone

Space/Science

Recent posts

Recent posts

Fewer Transient Alerts coming BuckGalaxy November 2, 2026 5:48 pm (Space/Science)
This report from Congress came out last week... podrock November 1, 2026 11:22 pm (Current Events)
Happy Halloween podrock October 31, 2026 3:03 am (Off Topic)
Expect one hell of a recession/depression in 2027 Arrell October 31, 2026 1:16 am (Current Events)
Next week will get ugly.... Arrell October 30, 2026 2:02 pm (Current Events)
Sir Patrick Stewart. podrock October 30, 2026 11:52 am (Off Topic)
Bernie Taupin. A great interview podrock October 30, 2026 3:05 am (Off Topic)
A new Dwarf Planet? Arrell October 30, 2026 12:49 am (Space/Science)
John Wheeler's philosophy: "Beyond the Black Hole" RL October 17, 2025 5:00 am (Space/Science)
"Engage!" BuckGalaxy October 29, 2026 10:58 pm (Off Topic)

On this day in Space/Science

1 year ago (that week) New Glenn set for its second launch on November 9 7 replies · Nov 5, 2025
5 years ago (that week) ZEISS Mineralogic 3D 1 reply · Nov 3, 2021
10 years ago (that week) CO2 to ethanol 0 replies · Nov 1, 2016

Log in
Register

Space/Science » in reply to re: 3,000 km/h ?

re: 3,000 km/h ?

Nemo — 12/12/2005 5:40:49 PM (archived)

You said astronauts in space, not in orbit.

Still its an accomplishment only three other national governments have been able to achieve, Russia, U.S. and China. And orbital is coming soon, Falcon IX is being designed to be man-rated.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (48 posts)

Shuttle shutdown savings?: Griffin or Zubrin - Buck Galaxy - 12/10/2005 7:29:59 AM
- Rarely works that way - alcaray - 12/13/2005 11:09:00 PM
  - Exactly! - E.P., the heretic - 12/14/2005 2:09:14 PM
    - Err. Then what about all your anti-Mars campaigning? (n/t) - alcaray - 12/14/2005 4:27:30 PM
      - Deleted EP post (n/t) - ModBob - 12/14/2005 10:56:21 PM
        
        Can you remind me what was wrong with it? - alcaray - 12/14/2005 11:43:16 PM
        
        re: Can you remind me what was wrong with it? - Chris Vancil - 12/14/2005 11:50:16 PM
        
        Thanks. Guess I did not notice. (n/t) - alcaray - 12/15/2005 5:45:16 PM
        
        re: Thanks. Guess I did not notice. - Chris Vancil - 12/15/2005 6:34:57 PM
        
        **If you feel that way, lets discuss it on community** - ModBob - 12/16/2005 5:43:53 PM
        
        re: **If you feel that way, lets discuss it on community** - Chris Vancil - 12/16/2005 9:42:58 PM
        
        "Mod Bob isn't consistence with this censorship." - E.P., the heretic - 12/16/2005 3:37:20 PM
        
        re: "Mod Bob isn't consistence with this censorship." - Chris Vancil - 12/16/2005 9:49:37 PM
- The Difference - Mark Eby - 12/10/2005 7:20:09 PM
  - PS - Mark Eby - 12/10/2005 7:44:59 PM
    - "Start with different requirements and you will end with different solutions." - E.P., the heretic - 12/11/2005 6:16:16 PM
      - re: "Start with different requirements and you will end with different solutions." - Mark Eby - 12/11/2005 11:28:57 PM
        
        re: "Start with different requirements and you will end with different solutions." - Nemo - 12/12/2005 5:48:29 PM
        
        "move on" to what? - E.P., the heretic - 12/13/2005 4:15:43 AM
        
        re: "move on" to what? - Nemo - 12/13/2005 4:13:24 PM
        
        re: "move on" to what? - Chris Vancil - 12/13/2005 9:27:00 AM
        
        Both the lack of awrareness of reality and the faulty logic are stunning - E.P., the heretic - 12/13/2005 2:14:50 PM
        
        re: Right back at you "Both the lack of awrareness of reality and the faulty logic are stunning" - Chris Vancil - 12/13/2005 10:46:49 PM
        
        and here was some poll which shows a different view - E.P., the heretic - 12/13/2005 4:36:38 AM
        
        re: and here was some poll which shows a different view - Chris Vancil - 12/13/2005 8:37:54 AM
        
        1989 Gallup poll - E.P., the heretic - 12/13/2005 4:40:41 AM
        
        re: 2005 Gallup poll - Chris Vancil - 12/13/2005 9:43:49 AM
        
        51% - but with ISS as ISS - E.P., the heretic - 12/13/2005 1:52:04 PM
        
        "the human missions of NASA need to be of public interest or risk loosing public support." - E.P., the heretic - 12/12/2005 1:12:39 AM
- neither one has a clue - E.P., the heretic - 12/10/2005 3:51:07 PM
  - re: You claim they don't have a clue... - Chris Vancil - 12/10/2005 7:31:30 PM
    - they're not the only ones (n/t) - E.P., the heretic - 12/11/2005 6:07:33 PM
      - re: Thanks Ed, admitting your clueless is the first step to acquiring knowledge. Here wishing you gaining some knowledge about the subject real soon. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/12/2005 1:51:48 AM
  - DOD charged with impact hazard response - phil - 12/10/2005 3:54:47 PM
    - The Brown Ammendment will go through - E.P., the heretic - 12/10/2005 4:09:01 PM
      - and its language will include comets - E.P., the heretic - 12/10/2005 4:19:39 PM
- re: Shuttle shutdown savings?: Griffin or Zubrin - Sawyer - 12/10/2005 2:14:11 PM
  - Are they worth it? - Nemo - 12/10/2005 11:05:49 PM
  - The NASA Jobs Program - phil - 12/10/2005 3:53:27 PM
    - re: The NASA Jobs Program - Tom Brosz - 12/12/2005 6:23:18 AM
      - re: The NASA Jobs Program - Scott Evil - 12/13/2005 6:09:01 AM
    - re: And if it were not a jobs program? - Raoul - 12/10/2005 7:43:39 PM
      - re: And if it were not a jobs program? - Nemo - 12/10/2005 10:46:10 PM
        
        re: 3,000 km/h ? - Raoul - 12/10/2005 11:47:26 PM
        
        re: 3,000 km/h ? - Nemo - 12/12/2005 5:40:49 PM
- re: Shuttle shutdown savings?: Griffin or Zubrin - Raoul - 12/10/2005 11:48:43 AM
  - Putting foreign nations in the critical path - Buck Galaxy - 12/11/2005 8:02:46 AM
  - re: Shuttle shutdown savings?: Griffin or Zubrin - Nemo - 12/10/2005 10:50:46 PM

HabitableZone — be civil, or at least entertaining.