I still don't understand why that war ever took place.
Was it for Iraq's oil? Then it failed...
But conservatives will say in chorus it wasn't at al for the oil...A convenient way to avoid recognizing the failure.
Was it to capture, neutralize Saddam? But it happened and yet, the war still goes on? Something is very wrong there...
Was it to change the regime? And put what instead? Something the elections decided? But isn't it a religious regime then? With far less freedom to women? A regime very close to its neighbour Iran?
Remember Algeria?
Somebody must one day head the country (or it will split) and he'll have to be accepted by everybody in Iraq, not necessarily elsewhere.
Flame » in reply to Update on the Enlightened's dealings with Iraq as it builds atomic weapons
re: Why the war?
The whole thread (49 posts)
- Update on the Enlightened's dealings with Iraq as it builds atomic weapons
- re: Why the war?
- Unforrtunately...
- Continued talks
- You make it sound like the US has no input.
- re: Iran v Iraq
- Sounds similar to our approach to the NK problem. Wake me up when they have had 6 years to deal with Iraq. (n/t)
- Shouldn't folks be concerned with getting nukes out of the Middle East?
- Should be "Iran" of course. Meanwhile...
- Gee, that sounds familiar?
- Yes, Publius. Sharia is exactly the same thing as U.S. democracy.
- Thank you.......
- You know he did not say nor imply anything of the kind. (n/t)
- Yes, Publius. Sharia is exactly the same thing as U.S. democracy.
- Gee, that sounds familiar?
