Is Zack singing the same song as Bush only with different lyrics?
After all, when the first concern is the protection of Islamic land, if we substitute "private property" for land (and leave out Islamic) this is the sacred mantra of the Republican party and it has been previously endorsed by both John Locke and Ayn Rand.
"Second, install sharia (Islamic law) on the entire Earth and spread Islamic justice there (...). Boyo, this could be Bush wanting to bring his version of "freedom" to Iraq, North Korea, etc. and install the US system of democracy.
And when Zack says, "The attacks will not cease until after the victory of Islam and the setting up of sharia," this sounds much like Bush's "We will stay the course."
Hey, they both say, "Bring it On!" And they both spout hollow rhetoric to avoid the difficult path of working out problems non-Rambo style.
Publius
Flame » in reply to Should be "Iran" of course. Meanwhile...
Gee, that sounds familiar?
The whole thread (49 posts)
- Update on the Enlightened's dealings with Iraq as it builds atomic weapons
- re: Why the war?
- Unforrtunately...
- Continued talks
- You make it sound like the US has no input.
- re: Iran v Iraq
- Sounds similar to our approach to the NK problem. Wake me up when they have had 6 years to deal with Iraq. (n/t)
- Shouldn't folks be concerned with getting nukes out of the Middle East?
- Should be "Iran" of course. Meanwhile...
- Gee, that sounds familiar?
- Yes, Publius. Sharia is exactly the same thing as U.S. democracy.
- Thank you.......
- You know he did not say nor imply anything of the kind. (n/t)
- Yes, Publius. Sharia is exactly the same thing as U.S. democracy.
- Gee, that sounds familiar?
