Well...

Off Topic » in reply to What a disgrace...

Well...

Robert — 2/24/2006 6:52:31 PM (archived)

...let's not forget that, technically, he was elected. At least the second time, which is plenty of cause for embarrassment..."fool me once, shame on you, ..." etc. What's our excuse for being fooled a second time?

The whole thread (38 posts)

A few recent Bushisms - Laurie Street - 2/23/2006 9:22:03 PM
- I disagree - Robert - 2/24/2006 6:50:20 PM
  - Actually I agree with you Robert - Laurie Street - 2/26/2006 10:02:52 PM
    - Thanks - Robert - 2/28/2006 5:50:43 PM
    - And JFK would not have been re-elected. - Bowser - 2/28/2006 8:22:37 AM
    - Thank you Laurie - Lindy - 2/27/2006 12:15:12 AM
  - How soon we forget... - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2006 6:59:41 PM
    - Reagan spoke well off-the-cuff. - RobVg - 2/25/2006 2:30:52 AM
    - ...or misremember... - Robert - 2/24/2006 7:33:35 PM
      - re: ...or misremember... - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2006 9:15:13 PM
        
        re: Who's crazy? - Raoul - 2/24/2006 9:55:38 PM
        
        "unilateral?" - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2006 11:24:53 PM
        
        re: "unilateral?" - Laurie Street - 2/26/2006 10:06:00 PM
        
        re: "unilateral?" - gbaikie - 2/26/2006 11:15:12 PM
        
        re: "unilateral?" - Laurie Street - 2/26/2006 11:46:41 PM
        
        re: "unilateral?" - gbaikie - 2/26/2006 1:40:13 AM
- re: A few recent Bushisms - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2006 6:42:18 AM
  - re: A few recent Bushisms - dtb - 2/27/2006 1:31:44 PM
  - Oh c'mon - Robert - 2/24/2006 6:58:57 PM
  - Hey Tom! When was the last time you had "to put food on your family?" (n/t) - Lindy - 2/24/2006 3:23:22 PM
  - Be honest, Tom.... - R.L. - 2/24/2006 2:18:47 PM
    - Compared to who? - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2006 5:30:00 PM
      - Sigh...I honestly expected you to do that.... - R.L. - 2/24/2006 6:27:00 PM
        
        The fact that you did not answer the questions I posed says a lot (n/t) - R.L. - 2/24/2006 6:28:22 PM
        
        The fact that the question was loaded had something to do with that. - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2006 6:53:17 PM
        
        re: The fact that the question was loaded had something to do with that. - R.L. - 2/24/2006 7:29:51 PM
        
        ;) I understand your silence (n/t) - R.L. - 2/25/2006 3:05:33 AM
        
        I doubt that - gbaikie - 2/26/2006 9:57:22 PM
        
        "Scuse me?" - Lindy - 2/27/2006 3:15:54 AM
  - Tom, we are NOT talking about verbal 'typos' - R.L. - 2/24/2006 2:11:18 PM
- What a disgrace... - R.L. - 2/24/2006 5:51:12 AM
  - Well... - Robert - 2/24/2006 6:52:31 PM
- How timely! This just in... - Tony - 2/23/2006 9:25:58 PM
  - even so .. - Daniel - 2/25/2006 8:28:22 AM
  - So the president is having his presidential meetings with staff... - alcaray - 2/23/2006 11:26:10 PM
    - It's an evil plan to keep them from falling asleep (n/t) - gbaikie - 2/24/2006 2:30:12 AM
    - re: So the president is having his presidential meetings with staff... - Lindy - 2/24/2006 1:25:47 AM
  - Perfect addition! (n/t) - Laurie Street - 2/23/2006 9:38:40 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (38 posts)