You first...
I'm sorry if my responses seem a bit unfriendly but it gets old reading you dinosaurs rhetorically fart fern stucco at each other. And oh yeah, it's still rhetoric even if you agree with the sentiment. And I notice Brosz didn't get one of these friendly admonitions.
This long ago stopped being about science, and became a war of political dogma. Where I have trouble here is convincing anyone that scientists as political and self-serving as politicians. You'd think the recent stem-cell flap would have shown that. It's less a matter of lying than it is filtering data for a result you really want to be true. Oddly, nobody has any trouble believing scientists will tilt data to benefit a corporation, but won't do it to benefit their own careers.
Very statesman.
Space/Science » in reply to Please rein in your rhetoric
What's next, rhetoric trials?
The whole thread (45 posts)
- Solar constant variation drives global warming?
- re: Solar constant variation drives global warming?
- I think an ice age would be far more destructive
- Thanks ER
- Solar variation NOT mere luminosity
- Right here ER.
- re: global warming drivers
- re: "Burden of proof" vs "ruling out"
- re: "Solar constant VARIATION" - that's the catch
- Suppose global warming altered civilization.....
