"no one blames it on global warning."

Space/Science » in reply to re: scientific study drivers

"no one blames it on global warning."

Tom Brosz — 10/15/2006 10:59:18 PM (archived)

If you had been looking at the news last year, pretty much everybody and their cat blamed the 2005 hurricane season on global warming. There were indeed weather scientists who pointed out the natural cycles, but they were, for the most part, drowned out.

The whole thread (45 posts)

Solar constant variation drives global warming? - ER - 10/15/2006 12:43:28 PM
- re: Solar constant variation drives global warming? - Pugs - 10/16/2006 9:44:32 PM
  - Maybe not control it, perhaps prevent it. (n/t) - ER - 10/17/2006 1:04:01 AM
- I think an ice age would be far more destructive - SDF - 10/16/2006 1:53:47 PM
  - Excellent point. - ER - 10/16/2006 3:40:56 PM
- Thanks ER - Buck Galaxy - 10/16/2006 7:22:40 AM
- Solar variation NOT mere luminosity - JimO - 10/15/2006 10:57:19 PM
- Right here ER. - et - 10/15/2006 7:28:05 PM
  - Please rein in your rhetoric - JimO - 10/15/2006 11:00:30 PM
    - What's next, rhetoric trials? - end transmission - 10/16/2006 1:00:50 AM
      - "Tu quoque" rebuttal? - JimO - 10/16/2006 1:00:25 PM
        
        how ridiculous - pwokenyaw - 10/16/2006 3:32:58 PM
        
        re: how ridiculous - JimO - 10/16/2006 3:46:05 PM
        
        Rhetoric techniques - Tom Brosz - 10/16/2006 5:19:54 PM
        
        here's a trick from us lawyers - pwokenyaw - 10/16/2006 7:31:04 PM
        
        re: here's a trick from us lawyers - JimO - 10/16/2006 8:15:44 PM
        
        What we say vs how we say it. - Buck Galaxy - 10/17/2006 8:08:38 AM
- re: global warming drivers - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2006 6:53:53 PM
  - re: global warming drivers - ER - 10/15/2006 8:05:08 PM
    - re: global warming drivers - JimO - 10/15/2006 9:43:44 PM
      - funny how the pro-tech denialists on this board have no interest in carbon sequestration - pwokenyaw - 10/16/2006 3:41:29 PM
        
        carbon sequestration - JimO - 10/16/2006 8:19:22 PM
        
        re: carbon sequestration - pwokenyaw - 10/17/2006 4:21:14 PM
      - That seems like a reasonable response to me. - ER - 10/15/2006 10:10:09 PM
        
        I'm with you on nuclear power. - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2006 10:40:30 PM
        
        The safety and crime-fighting benefits... - ER - 10/15/2006 10:55:14 PM
    - re: scientific study drivers - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2006 9:06:09 PM
      - Hurricanes - Buck Galaxy - 10/15/2006 11:03:32 PM
        
        Where are the deadly hurricanes this year, Buck? - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2006 11:55:28 PM
        
        re: Where are the deadly hurricanes this year, Buck? - Buck Galaxy - 10/16/2006 7:16:43 AM
      - re: scientific study drivers - ER - 10/15/2006 10:48:31 PM
        
        "no one blames it on global warning." - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2006 10:59:18 PM
  - So much 'belief", so little time... - end transmission - 10/15/2006 7:24:42 PM
- re: "Burden of proof" vs "ruling out" - Fox - 10/15/2006 3:08:48 PM
  - coupling mechanism - JimO - 10/15/2006 4:02:53 PM
    - All I'm interested in (in this thread) is whether I'm orbiting a variable star. (n/t) - Fox - 10/16/2006 2:49:38 AM
      - re: Variable Star? - nick hoffman - 10/16/2006 2:03:18 PM
  - re: "Burden of proof" vs "ruling out" - ER - 10/15/2006 3:43:10 PM
    - Addendum. - ER - 10/15/2006 3:51:42 PM
- re: "Solar constant VARIATION" - that's the catch - E.P. - 10/15/2006 2:34:23 PM
  - re: "Solar constant VARIATION" - that's the catch - ER - 10/15/2006 2:56:09 PM
    - Maunder minimum and ice age during 70 years... - Raoul - 10/15/2006 3:09:09 PM
- Suppose global warming altered civilization..... - SDF - 10/15/2006 2:17:47 PM
  - re: Populations displaced - Raoul - 10/15/2006 3:01:26 PM
  - re: Suppose global warming altered civilization..... - ER - 10/15/2006 2:43:42 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (45 posts)