EVERYTHING is a possibility. I can't PROVE there is no Santa Clause or Easter Bunny. Those things which can be conceived always vastly outnumber those which are actually true. It goes without saying that most of those things we can think of are simply not true. In the law, suspects are innocent until proven guilty, because it is better for every villain to go free than for one innocent to be condemned. In science, all the suspects are guilty until proven otherwise, because it is better for many things to remain unknown than for one lie to be accepted as truth.
The lie is not only evil in itself, it pollutes and confuses all truth around it. In both science and law we rely on precedent and procedure and on the process itself to arrive at the truth. Amendment and change and even a total paradigm shift are possible, but only by adherence to a principle and discipline which has been demonstrably successful for the last four hundred years. No other system of human inquiry has come even remotely close to science's record of telling us how the world works and what it's really like. Just because something is reasonable or desirable or interesting does not mean it can be trusted, especially since we know scoundrels deliberately and maliciously exploit this for their own ends.
Accepting this kind of nonsense uncritically would degrade science to the same sorry and pathetic state as economics, philosophy, politics, and religion. Science does not guarantee truth, as we all know, it makes mistakes. But what you are talking about does guarantee falsehood.
By the way, you are misusing the term "pseudoskeptic". A pseudo-skeptic is not someone with a closed mind who refuses to accept anything new, as you imply I am doing. It is someone who pretends to be skeptical, but isn't, who accepts everything because they feel that is a sign of an open mind, which is what I imply you are doing.
"It is the mark of a fool to embrace anything which cannot be immediately disproven."
Hank
Off Topic » in reply to re: Shame on you...back at 'ya!
How do you spell "raspberry"?
The whole thread (86 posts)
- Exploring Extraterrestial Objects in Situ
- Hey SheepLookUp!
- I'm impressed at the work that went into this.
- "They most often change, who would be constant in happiness or wisdom" (n/t)
- Moved from Space Sciences (n/t)
- This story seems to grow in the telling.
- Actually, this is a phenomenon worth studying.
- You are right..they did it for fun AND the money!!!
- "Their technology is different"
- Technology is a Gift of God. After the gift of life it is perhaps the greatest of God's Gifts It is the mother of civilizations, of arts and sciences"... (n/t)
- That's exactly the way I would expect alien machines to work:
- I think you may need an ad-visor...
- That wins the Geordi LaForge Award for today... (n/t)
- re: That's exactly the way I would expect alien machines to work:
- Typo correction
- The biggest question is.....
- This is Off Topic....
- re: The biggest question is.....
- "Bets on future planetary detections"
- You are the ones ignoring the facts
- Out of idle curiosity, in your opinion...
- re: Out of idle curiosity, in your opinion...
- SDAI!!
- I see.
- re: I see.
- to answer your questions
- "Do you think these guys working in top secret programs carry around a card identifying themselves as to who they are?"
- re: I see.
- re: Out of idle curiosity, in your opinion...
- Out of idle curiosity, in your opinion...
