The key to space exploration is propulsion. Once you have licked that, everything else falls into place.
As one example, the risks of mechanical and other failures are greatly lessened if you have enough power to take along a big load of spares, or even ideally, fly small fleets of ships instead of just one.
Humans provide the economy of flexibility. In a human crew, a few specialists would be devoted to maintaining the infrastructure, but most of the crew would attend to other specialties on a day-by-day basis. In the event of an emergency, a properly cross-trained crew can instantly be repurposed to repair the damage. Machines specialize, humans generalize. You get the equivalent of self-monitoring AIs and robotic repair crews effectively for free with a human crew.
I think that pretty much says it in a nutshell. That's how things are done in most human organizations now.
By the time you get robots that can do what people can, they will BE people, and aren't going to like the idea of being disposable any more than people do.
Space/Science » in reply to re: bandwidth and latency
re: bandwidth and latency
The whole thread (42 posts)
- Robots or humans: time to grow up?
- This is so typical...
- We were wrong in the 40's and the 50's...Why would we be right today?
- re: Robots or humans: time to grow up?
- Not an either-or, really, but I vote for people in the long run.
- bandwidth and latency
- re: Robots or humans: get real
- Robots are people too
- re: Robots or humans: time to grow up?
- Science, or ego? Or both? Doing what each does best.
- re: Robots or humans: time to grow up?
- What people want is change, new things....
