I bellieve the best way to assure the future of manned space travel (which I support) is to de-emphasize it now and explore space with as many automated probes as possible until we identify those missions which demand human crews.
I think that's *entirely* reasonable. Maybe in a few years, or a generation, we'll be in a better position to really bankroll manned spaceflight. Maybe I should emphasize that I'm talking here about "socialized spaceflight," because the private sector, it seems, is apparently willing and increasingly able to loft people into space.
A balanced approach is usually prudent, as I think you're suggesting. I guess I'm saying that when bucks are in limited supply, seeking to maximize the related bang isn't a bad idea either :-)
Just remember the old saying, "No bucks, no Buck Robot."
Thanks for your insightful response.
Space/Science » in reply to re: Robots or humans: time to grow up?
re: Robots or humans: time to grow up?
The whole thread (42 posts)
- Robots or humans: time to grow up?
- This is so typical...
- We were wrong in the 40's and the 50's...Why would we be right today?
- re: Robots or humans: time to grow up?
- Not an either-or, really, but I vote for people in the long run.
- bandwidth and latency
- re: Robots or humans: get real
- Robots are people too
- re: Robots or humans: time to grow up?
- Science, or ego? Or both? Doing what each does best.
- re: Robots or humans: time to grow up?
- What people want is change, new things....
