Sounds like ER nailed you to the wall, Tom. You're such an extremist on this subject that I fully expect you to rejoice if humanity's killed off by global cooling instead of warming, just so you can feel like you've won on a technicality.
As for the article itself, none of the rest of us can read it without paying about $100 for a subscription. Nice touch. Guess that's one way to ensure that you get the last word.
Only general comment is possible under the circumstances: Geez, man, it's just one article, and that's never enough to force the mainstream of science to make an instant 180. Quite a kneejerk partisan reaction to declare all the existing science about ozone depletion null and void over one paper.
How about doing your impression of a disembodied brain floating in a bell jar of formaldehyde? I love that one, never gets old, cracks me up each and every time.
Current Events » in reply to CFCs and the ozone hole. Oops?
Going off half-cocked again?
The whole thread (41 posts)
- CFCs and the ozone hole. Oops?
- Never ask a chemist to do a physicists job. ;-) (n/t)
- And 40% is in man's control. What's the issue? (n/t)
- Going off half-cocked again?
- You can barely contain your glee, can you?