The problem with explaining things
Is that you make like thirty incorrect assumptions or premises in a typical post, and it's just too damn much work.
I have mentioned this in regard to political or economic posts, where in order to build up an argument, you have to first demolish a huge infrastructure of incorrect ideas, and this is not easy.
The heat of the nuclear power industry is lost in the noise when compared to the immense natural inflow and outflow of Earth's thermal energy. After all this time, I can't even get that simple concept across.
You confuse the energy of nuclear particles with heat. You assume cooling water vapor is "superheated," when in point of fact it's barely above bathwater temperature. I could go on and on.
What's the point?