You definitely delivered.
I'd have to plow through that a bit more. I have a very hard time believing that the U.S. is on exactly the same level with near-totalitarian nations unless somebody's leaning on the data a bit.
For example, do they simply discard state laws and regulations, and assume that if there's no Federal law that it doesn't count? I know for a fact that California has extensive privacy laws. Don't know about other states.
Also, in the context of freedom and individual rights, I classify "surveillance" as a government authority of some kind doing it. Usually without my consent. Same for other privacy issues, like ID cards, phone tapping, and other things like that.
I'm not sure Safeway knowing what groceries I buy because I use the discount card, e-mail spam, or any of many private voluntary entities that have access to my information should be brought into this calculation.
Current Events » in reply to "The 2007 International Privacy Ranking"
Well, I asked for it!
The whole thread (77 posts)
- Microsoft "spy" software patent.
- Hook it up to a device that delivers an electric shock and you've got something. (n/t)
- I knew Microsoft was Evit! (n/t)
- Not the first, possibly not the worst
- Speaking of online project listings
- Sounds like the Feds in Snowcrash, only taken further.... (n/t)
- I blame it all on "Human Resources".
- re: Not the first, possibly not the worst
- re: Not the first, possibly not the worst
- re: Not the first, possibly not the worst
- The joys of synopticon living
- "Your comments about surveillance societies and the attempt to blame them on Liberal values is a bit of a hoot"
- re: synopticon living
- The joys of synopticon living
- re: Not the first, possibly not the worst
- re: Not the first, possibly not the worst
- Freekin BS
- Text of the application
- Big Brother wants to know if you are telling the truth! (n/t)
- There goes "fake it 'till yah make it".
