"All Mann's data and coding is available. His work has been repeated multiple times."
The exact method Mann used has not been repeated. It is doubtful whether Mann could repeat what he did.
Mann has provided some information, but at one point in this sorry mess, he was claiming his computer code was his property and didn't need to provide it.
Instead of being happy someone was repeating his scientific work, Mann has stonewall constantly. No one has done the exact process Mann did to get this graph- Mann complains that they aren't doing this. NO one HAS. Mann has to be the only Man who do the wonders he does- and don't look behind the curtain!!
"The rest of your stuff misses the point, that McKitrick doesn't know what he's doing."
The result he got is due to some data given by Mann giving him clues of how he went about it. If McKitrick doesn't know who other then Mann knows. Science is suppose to be able to be repeated, if not, then it's not science.
We do know that Mann has made stupid errors, the idea that only Mann is knowledgable enough is laughable.
Flame » in reply to re: more info about your alleged debunker of global warming
re: more info about your alleged debunker of global warming
The whole thread (48 posts)
- A summary of Hockey stick
- more info about your alleged debunker of global warming
- Average temperatures
- re: more info about your alleged debunker of global warming
- Seems that review of the criticism is mired in legitimate controversey
- He and TB get their talking points from right wing blogs...
- You're starting to yap.
- No, you are swalloing conspiracy BS
- re: conspiracy BS
- re: No, you are swalloing conspiracy BS
- Moderator:This had no business being moved
- No, you are swalloing conspiracy BS
- You're starting to yap.
- more info about your alleged debunker of global warming
