"No, you predictably pulled it off some right wing blog and obviously looked no further, just as you obviously looked no further on the solar/cosmic ray/climate assertion."
Simple question, other than some right winger who else has repeated Oreskes experiment?
You will note that the Left wingers [oh, I mean the respectable scientists] don't simply do what the so called righter winger did and repeat the experiment and publish their results. And this is the normal way you do this, not attack a person who actually repeats a experiment and publish his results.
You see you have it completely backwards, it's Oreskes who making the claim that 75% of scientific journal support AGW and her proof was her experiment. Which as it turns out is nothing more than a experiment of how idiots allow their bias to affect their result.
Flame » in reply to No, you are swalloing conspiracy BS
re: No, you are swalloing conspiracy BS
The whole thread (48 posts)
- A summary of Hockey stick
- more info about your alleged debunker of global warming
- Average temperatures
- re: more info about your alleged debunker of global warming
- Seems that review of the criticism is mired in legitimate controversey
- He and TB get their talking points from right wing blogs...
- You're starting to yap.
- No, you are swalloing conspiracy BS
- re: conspiracy BS
- re: No, you are swalloing conspiracy BS
- Moderator:This had no business being moved
- No, you are swalloing conspiracy BS
- You're starting to yap.
- more info about your alleged debunker of global warming
