It's obvious that the "one sparrow" fallacy applies in spades to climate studies. But some sparrows seem to be more equal than others.
You would have to admit that short-term phenomena that support the "Earth's getting hot fast" meme get a lot of play, and are touted as proof. But short-term phenomena that seem to show a different outcome are dismissed as...well...short term phenomena.
In fact, neither are as relevant as long-term trends, but that's not how they're played out.
The big Arctic Melt last season made headlines for weeks. Now we're looking at a pretty solid winter freeze this year. If the melt this summer isn't as drastic as last year, what do you think the response will be?
Space/Science » in reply to I will go over the points in detail later today, but let me just say this now
The other side of that coin
The whole thread (59 posts)
- Part 1: Global Warming and Sea Level Change READ TO THE END before responding
- Temperature rise
- How much new arable land becomes available due to a global warming cycle?
- For temperature rise on the low side of the range...
- The world will definitely be worse, much worse.
- re: Part 1: Global Warming and Sea Level Change READ TO THE END before responding
- Thermocline and temperature structure of the ocean
- Thermal expansion of ocean water.
- re: Global Warming and Sea Level Change
- re the antarctica data...
- Okay, are you sure you put the right link?
- I will go over the points in detail later today, but let me just say this now
- sea ice extent currently is BELOW the recent mean
- Ocean temperature update
- Arrrrgh, not sure how it became IIPC it should read IPCC (n/t)
