Well, how would I know if it's gobbledegook?
I already said I didn't understand the math.
I repeated one of the comments and gave a link where they were discussing it.
You tell me it's gobbledygook, I believe you.
And I'm not going to stop posting some of the more significant formations just because a few posters here tell me it looks like a human design mathematically, and yet can't explain the bent nodes or how these elaborate formations can be done without getting caught or damaging the plants.
>"you almost always dismiss the skeptical explanation outright."
I enjoy the participation and the comments, but don't expect me to concede, just because one of you can dismiss one of the anomalies with a simple explanation that avoids looking at the whole picture. I already agree that some are man made, but there's too many other unexplained problems with it. There are plenty of CD's available with aerial shots of hundreds of these crop circles. Until you see a compilation that large and with that many do you begin to realize that this IS a phenomena. If there is a small group producing these world wide, they are geniuses and undetectable. They should be be cleaning up with their success, because they've never been caught. They ought to be on National Geographic or something.
But no, you never will, because they cannot duplicate what's already been done by an unseen hand.
We are LONG past Doug and Dave, two old drunk geezers with their ropes and planks. That's for sure.
Off Topic » in reply to re: Here's a mathematical perspective
re: Here's a mathematical perspective
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Most complex crop circle ever discovered in British fields
- COOL New Circle
- Don't the farmers get pissed?
- Progression
- Why "a seminal event?"
- Well, maybe it boggles some minds
- 8 segments doesn't work for our base 10 number system though.
- Sure it does. This isn't numbers, it's graphics.
- It's just for a freehand doodler to divide a circle in eight segments than ten. Try it.
- re: It's just for a freehand doodler to divide a circle in eight segments than ten. Try it.
- It's just for a freehand doodler to divide a circle in eight segments than ten. Try it.
- Humans?
- Woudl aliens have 10 fingers and toes? Or even fingers and toes?
- Sure it does. This isn't numbers, it's graphics.
- 8 segments doesn't work for our base 10 number system though.
- Why do you suppose they are getting more complex? (n/t)
- re: Why do you suppose they are getting more complex?
- Not complex, just irrational.
- They're just getting better at making them.