Nope, but bad science in TV shows has real world implications...
The "CSI Effect" (sometimes referred to as the "CSI syndrome") is a reference to the phenomenon of popular television shows such as the CSI franchise raising crime victims' and jury members' real-world expectations of forensic science, especially crime scene investigation and DNA testing.[1] Much of these concerns stem from the "dramatic license" taken by the writers of forensic science television--glamorizing the field, overstating the accuracy of forensic techniques, and exaggerating the abilities of forensic science.[2] This is said to have changed the way many trials are presented today, in that prosecutors are pressured to deliver more forensic evidence in court.[3][4]
...
People who overestimate the reality-basis of shows such as CSI may develop unreasonable expectations of actual forensic practitioners. Although the technologies lauded on these fictional programs are found in real crime labs, they often require much more time and deliver answers more equivocal in real life than on television. Analysts worry that people will come to believe that real criminalist science has become as swift and certain as we have always wished justice to be. DNA evidence in particular is expected more and more by jurors whether it is relevant or not in a given case. Some potential jurors find themselves, during voir dire, being asked whether they are viewers of shows such as CSI.