Off Topic » in reply to re: What would you consider as actual evidence?

The whole thread (56 posts)

• Canada opens up it's UFO Files - Lindy - 2/18/2009 5:05:53 AM
  • I am so excited. Now we can find out what all of the drunks and loonies in Canada have been seeing. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/20/2009 1:07:45 PM
    • DFM, you won't have to wait long.... - Lindy - 2/24/2009 4:57:49 AM
    • DFM, you won't have to wait long.... - Lindy - 2/24/2009 4:57:44 AM
      • Yawn. And what will come of these revelations? Nothing! (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/25/2009 5:50:56 AM
    • re: You know David that - Johannes - 2/21/2009 12:05:44 AM
      • There is a big difference between an Open Mind and an Empty Head. - David F Mayer - 2/22/2009 12:23:17 PM
        • What gives the UFO people credibility is - azstrummer - 2/27/2009 12:48:07 AM
        • What Obama has to say about aliens - Lindy - 2/24/2009 4:25:56 AM
        • re: What would you consider as actual evidence? - Johannes - 2/22/2009 8:11:58 PM
          • I have scrutinized a great deal of UFO malarkey. - David F Mayer - 2/23/2009 3:08:38 PM
            • re:The Phooey factor. - Johannes - 2/24/2009 3:24:06 AM
              • Obvious fake. - David F Mayer - 2/25/2009 5:49:56 AM
                • In the first film, it's some kind of marks or spalling on the canopy. - TB - 2/25/2009 6:48:44 PM
              • re: re:The Phooey factor. - Buck Galaxy - 2/24/2009 7:02:12 AM
          • ABSOLUTELY INCONTROVERTABLE PROOF ALIENS ARE AMOUNG US! - Buck Galaxy - 2/22/2009 10:10:46 PM
            • Isn't that Tom? - Lindy - 2/23/2009 3:47:08 AM
              • I THINK THIS PROVES TOM ISN'T WHO HE SAYS HE IS! - Buck Galaxy - 2/23/2009 8:04:51 AM
                • You have guessed the TRUTH! Tom is a space alien from the Planet Zorg. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/26/2009 2:39:54 AM
            • re: That is not very convincing - Johannes - 2/23/2009 1:07:08 AM
              • Same old crap. Nothing remotely resembling evidence! (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/25/2009 12:01:56 PM
              • re: That is not very convincing - TB - 2/24/2009 7:18:01 PM
                • re: Thanks, the pictures are interesting. - Johannes - 2/25/2009 4:27:47 AM
                  • And how do YOU interpret that picture? (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/25/2009 12:56:41 PM
                    • re: I believe the witnesses they say it was a natural phenomenon. (n/t) - Johannes - 2/25/2009 6:33:04 PM
                  • Great site, thanks Johannes (n/t) - Lindy - 2/25/2009 5:53:01 AM
              • Going through life with egg on your face... - Buck Galaxy - 2/23/2009 5:01:04 PM
                • re: I do not recall using such words - Johannes - 2/24/2009 4:32:16 AM
                  • re: I do not recall using such words - Buck Galaxy - 2/24/2009 6:57:36 AM
                    • re: Yes, the line could have been - Johannes - 2/25/2009 2:17:14 AM
                      • Ever heard of the word "provenence"? - David F Mayer - 2/25/2009 12:58:58 PM
                      • Your comment proves why you are not a scientist - Buck Galaxy - 2/25/2009 6:33:49 AM
        • DFM and "delusion" - Lindy - 2/22/2009 5:18:45 PM
          • Again, phooey. You have yet to post a link to this "evidence". (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/23/2009 3:09:34 PM
            • Does lightening exist? - Lindy - 2/23/2009 6:28:02 PM
              • Plenty of evidence of lightning. Are you being silly? (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/25/2009 12:03:03 PM
              • yes - SDG - 2/23/2009 8:39:53 PM
                • "lightning is a well documented natural phenomena. " - Lindy - 2/24/2009 12:53:51 AM
                  • re: "lightning is a well documented natural phenomena. " - David F Mayer - 2/25/2009 12:04:15 PM
                  • That is why we need to capture one, Lindy - Socrates II - 2/24/2009 2:07:38 PM
                    • I agree - Lindy - 2/24/2009 4:02:00 PM
                  • Speaking of UFOs and lightning - Socrates II - 2/24/2009 5:29:29 AM
                    • re: Speaking of UFOs and lightning - Lindy - 2/24/2009 6:02:07 AM
                      • Not all UFOs are metallic discs - Socrates II - 2/24/2009 2:03:57 PM
                        • re: Not all UFOs are metallic discs - Lindy - 2/24/2009 4:05:34 PM
    • To be fair - Socrates II - 2/20/2009 3:56:12 PM
      • "we're probably not really ready for a meeting with a true intelligence " - Lindy - 2/20/2009 6:00:29 PM
        • So who is "worthy" enough to monitor these things? - Socrates II - 2/20/2009 6:27:28 PM
          • Unfortuantely.... - Lindy - 2/21/2009 12:02:48 AM
  • re: Very interesting. Thank You for posting it. - Johannes - 2/20/2009 2:34:14 AM
  • When ET's are outed, what next? - carl - 2/19/2009 5:41:17 PM
    • Eskimos (n/t) - McFly - 2/20/2009 9:38:48 PM
    • Possibility of a "false flag" operation? - Lindy - 2/20/2009 4:08:30 AM
  • re: Canada opens up it's UFO Files - Lindy - 2/18/2009 6:16:10 AM
    • "Eat your heart out America" ?? - SDAI-Tech1 - 2/18/2009 7:20:56 PM
      • I see what you're getting at....... - Lindy - 2/19/2009 2:11:39 AM