Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: point

Problems With Proposed Solutions Is Not A Scientific Basis For Rejecting The Problem

Not liking Kyoto or cap and trade is not a basis for ignoring scientific evidence or latching on to lame excuses to reject it. I never liked Kyoto and am not wild about cap and trade. If there are readily available solutions it will work, if not it's a cap on growth as well. I prefer the direct approach of research on energy alternatives and building infrastructure to support technology mature enough to implement.

The thing that really really pisses me off from a political point is that whether you believe in GW or not everyone should agree that our dependence on foreign oil is a huge detriment to our security and prosperity. Working to resolve that dependence in a way that also adresses GW is a win double win situation. It is ridiculous that we have delayed more than 3 decades adressing a common solution to one or more problems that are of concern to nearly everyone in total. It is a massive failure of our political system just like SS and medicare. A mature rational culture should be able to address large long term problems not continually push them off to future generations.

Regards,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (35 posts)