And not everyone has access to newspapers. So? If they did even more areas of the Earth would be stripped of trees.
If people want a digest there is always radio and TV news, both also free.
In terms of a new model, one of the best things about the extinction of the newspaper will the favorable impact it will have on the Earth's climate when millions of trees killed each year are no longer needed
http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/04/18/will-paper-kill-the-papers/
Reports that in 2001 alone newspapers killed 453 million trees.
Add in the carbon from turning those trees into pulp and transporting the pulp to landfills, with a short break in between to contaminate it with ink for reading, and newspapers have to be considered a major cause of climate change. Is people be able to read the opinions of the "talent" disguised as "news" worth that level of environmental damage to you?
Current Events » in reply to The reason newspapers are in the trouble they are today is that people are not paying them for what they supply.
re: Killing an environmental monster
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Mainstream media declares war on Internet
- No, big business perverts the free market.
- re: Mainstream media declares war on Internet
- Well, that's going to be a mess if they all do that.
- re: Mainstream media decide to test copyright law.
- re: Mainstream media decide to test copyright law.
- Copyright law makes no distinctions between news production and other creative work.
- Everyone has a monopoly on their own property.
- re: Mainstream media
- Hence the tracking programs.
- If we were to declare war on Brazil...
- re: Mainstream media decide to test copyright law.
