TB, you will note I am not promoting any particular political or economic philosophy, I never have. I am merely pointing out the inconsistencies and contradictions in yours. Or perhaps it would be fairer to say I am highlighting the inconsistencies and contradictions in your arguments. I studied Euclidean geometry in the 9th grade, I am not intimidated by your logic.
You, on the other hand, have adopted the position that anyone who does not accept all your propositions accepts none of them, and that anyone who does not accept your propositions must clearly support their exact opposites. In other words, you are "defining" us as wrong, not proving it. QED.
Not only that, those are shabby debating tactics.
Current Events » in reply to Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
The whole thread (58 posts)
- "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Define "impossible".
- Re: Define "impossible".
- Re: Define "impossible".
- Re: Define "impossible".
- Re: Define "impossible".
- Re: Define "impossible".
- You forgot the one about liberals eating their children.
- Re: Define "impossible".
- Re: Define "impossible".
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Re: "Are jobs obsolete?"
- Define "impossible".
