Re: Re: Irradiation

Flame » in reply to On "reasonable" regulations

Re: Re: Irradiation

BuckGalaxy — 10/8/2009 6:08:05 AM (archived)

What a pathetic attempt to dodge a legit question. Or are you again actually demonstrating another huge mental blind spot toward MIDDLE GROUND?

How about making a regulation and if it is ignored then they face severe fines? Or is safe food to eat not that important?

The whole thread (17 posts)

On "reasonable" regulations - TB - 9/25/2009 9:52:35 PM
- Re: intelligent suggestion - TB - 10/8/2009 4:13:31 PM
- YES OR NO? - BuckGalaxy - 10/8/2009 7:28:41 AM
- Re: "middle ground" - TB - 10/8/2009 6:23:04 AM
- Re: Re: Irradiation - BuckGalaxy - 10/8/2009 6:08:05 AM
- Re: Irradiation - TB - 10/8/2009 4:56:17 AM
- Irradiation - BuckGalaxy - 10/8/2009 4:44:11 AM
- Re: A little sidebar on safe food solutions - TB - 10/7/2009 4:08:11 PM
- Re: Re: Broken record - BuckGalaxy - 10/7/2009 4:06:10 AM
- Re: Broken record - TB - 10/7/2009 2:53:12 AM
- Re: Re: Re: Re: On "reasonable" regulations - BuckGalaxy - 10/7/2009 1:48:59 AM
- Re: Re: Re: On "reasonable" regulations - TB - 10/5/2009 10:27:19 PM
- Re: Re: On "reasonable" regulations - BuckGalaxy - 10/5/2009 9:57:42 PM
- Re: On "reasonable" regulations - TB - 10/4/2009 4:29:55 AM
- Re: Re: "reasonable" discussion - BuckGalaxy - 10/3/2009 8:00:05 PM
- Re: "reasonable" discussion - TB - 10/2/2009 3:13:01 PM
- "reasonable" discussion about regulations - BuckGalaxy - 10/2/2009 6:51:27 AM

Recent posts

The whole thread (17 posts)

Related discussions