YOu brought up irradiation as an alternative to more layers of bureaucrats. I agreed. You make an intelligent suggestion and I recognized it. However, you are unable to respond in a direct way about requiring this process simply because you can't bring yourself to agree with a good idea you pointed out yourself.
Yes or no, do you think Cargill would do irradiation if they were not required by law to do it? If your answer is yes they would do it all on their own you are either a gullible fool or a liar. If your answer is no they would not do it unless compelled to do so, then you are finally moderating your views enough to come to an honest conclusion. So, yes or no?
(odds anyone on the next post from TB not answering the question and instead titling the next post "moderating views and honest conclusions"?)
Flame » in reply to On "reasonable" regulations
YES OR NO?
The whole thread (17 posts)
- On "reasonable" regulations
- Re: intelligent suggestion
- YES OR NO?
- Re: "middle ground"
- Re: Re: Irradiation
- Re: Irradiation
- Irradiation
- Re: A little sidebar on safe food solutions
- Re: Re: Broken record
- Re: Broken record
- Re: Re: Re: Re: On "reasonable" regulations
- Re: Re: Re: On "reasonable" regulations
- Re: Re: On "reasonable" regulations
- Re: On "reasonable" regulations
- Re: Re: "reasonable" discussion
- Re: "reasonable" discussion
- "reasonable" discussion about regulations
