<A key issue that's emerged on this thread is the question of why Bush doesn't reveal the evidence he enigmatically claims to have.
...Believe me, Tom, I won't ignore the evidence if Bush finally releases it. He could end the controversy in a heartbeat. Why won't he?
This is indeed a key issue, and I can think of a number of plausible reasons why the information has been withheld, but they would only be educated guesses. What it boils down to is that barring further evidence, I think Bush knows what he is doing, and others here think he is nuts.
Like I told Bowser a while back, in a few months, one of us is going to be really disappointed.
I am really interested in seeing what pops up in the State of the Union Address, the day after the U.N. report.
Current Events » in reply to Re: Cripes.
Re: Key issue
The whole thread (52 posts)
- U.S. evidence on Iraq questioned.
- Re: U.S. evidence on Iraq questioned.
- That acorn didn't fall far from the tree
- Does this mean you are calling Bush a nut?...........n/t (n/t)
- But Sadam did have a Nuclear bomb manufacturing program then...
- God help me, I love it so....
- Unrequited love
- And now, from the Department of Really Slow Learners, we have...
- Things like what actually happened are wasted on Lindy et al. § (n/t)
- Your pal Saddam appreciates you very much.
