Re: By that logic...

Current Events » in reply to By that logic...

Re: By that logic...

Robert — 1/26/2003 9:32:17 AM (archived)

Yeah, I think that's the flaw in characterizing Iraq as the "plaintiff" in the case. As you say, "so?".

I'm interested in your thoughts about According to UNSC 1441, the final point of which seems to me to be a little more substantive a legalism.

--Robert

The whole thread (39 posts)

The burden of proof - Raoul - 1/25/2003 8:55:24 PM
- Not according to UNSC 1441 - Larry J - 1/26/2003 3:21:47 PM
  - According to UNSC 1441,,, - Robert - 1/26/2003 5:58:45 PM
  - Do NOT post facts, they frustrate the Old Europe mindset n/t (n/t) - p - 1/26/2003 4:20:12 PM
- Iraq is the plaintiff - ebnelson - 1/25/2003 3:59:49 PM
  - Re: Iraq is the plaintiff - Robert - 1/26/2003 5:19:14 PM
    - By that logic... - Tom Brosz - 1/26/2003 8:57:30 PM
      - Re: By that logic... - Robert - 1/26/2003 9:32:17 AM
    - If there is no contract, then we are entitled to kick their butts freely - ebnelson - 1/26/2003 2:01:57 PM
  - Re: Inspections - Raoul - 1/26/2003 10:01:36 AM
- Re: The burden of proof - McFly - 1/25/2003 12:46:13 PM
  - Twisted logic - Splinx - 1/25/2003 1:58:17 PM
    - Re: Twisted logic - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2003 2:14:38 PM
      - Wrong Again - Splinx - 1/26/2003 3:05:23 PM
        
        Hello? Anyone at home in there? - Tom Brosz - 1/26/2003 9:14:34 AM
        
        Ok, try this - Splinx - 1/26/2003 11:39:04 AM
      - Re: Twisted logic - Raoul - 1/26/2003 9:47:26 AM
- Ironic - Robert - 1/25/2003 10:34:37 AM
  - Proof - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2003 1:23:14 PM
  - Re: European Convention on Human Rights - Raoul Lannoy - 1/25/2003 11:24:59 AM
    - Thanks for correcting me - Robert - 1/26/2003 5:05:43 PM
      - Note officially taken. ;-) (n/t) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 1/27/2003 11:06:24 AM
      - Re: Thanks for your posts - Raoul Lannoy - 1/26/2003 5:54:03 PM
        
        And thanks back at ya - Robert - 1/26/2003 6:33:59 PM
- No, the burden of proof is clearly on Iraq, not on the US or anyone else - Matt Burley - 1/25/2003 9:37:37 AM
  - Bush and weapons of mass production.... - Publius - 1/25/2003 9:55:20 AM
    - The US and using nukes, etc. - Bowser - 1/25/2003 11:21:57 AM
      - Bush to Saddam, why will we kill you? - Publius - 1/25/2003 3:10:14 PM
    - I agree that nothing now will stop the war - Matt Burley - 1/25/2003 10:27:10 AM
      - Re: GWB serving OBL's interest - Raoul - 1/25/2003 12:18:03 PM
        
        the possibility of war serving OBL's interest.... - Publius - 1/25/2003 3:23:12 PM
        
        Al Queda is far too crazy for us to be concerned what their reactions would be - Matt Burley - 1/25/2003 12:46:31 PM
        
        Just a tad shortsighted Matt....... - Lindy - 1/25/2003 5:29:14 PM
        
        My definition of shortsighted - Matt Burley - 1/26/2003 7:35:46 PM
        
        Re: Just a tad short memoried - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2003 6:07:22 PM
        
        But Tom....... - Lindy - 1/26/2003 7:01:31 PM
        
        The "pipeline" is a French fantasy. Get over it. - Tom Brosz - 1/26/2003 9:19:00 AM
      - Military commanders - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2003 10:33:04 AM
- Re: The burden of proof - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2003 9:00:34 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (39 posts)