Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to Two U.S. Soldiers Killed in Northern Iraq

Meanwhile: What the Kay Report Really Says
Don — (archived)

The Iraq WMD hunt

Here’s what the David Kay report really says: The sanctions worked

By Fred Kaplan
SLATE.COM

Oct. 7 — David Kay’s interim report on whether Saddam Hussein had a serious program to build weapons of mass destruction — an investigation that Kay and 1,500 agents from the Pentagon’s Iraq Survey Group have been conducting for three months now — is a shockingly lame piece of work.

PRESIDENT BUSH has insisted that the report proves Saddam “was a danger to the world” and thus vindicates the war. Secretary of State Colin Powell chimed in that the Kay report left him “even more convinced … that we did the right thing.”

These statements were mustered to counter criticisms from Democratic senators who, upon reading the report, proclaimed that it proves only that Bush had no basis for whipping up prewar fears of an imminent Iraqi danger.

A close reading of the actual, unclassified report — which Kay delivered as testimony on Oct. 2 to a panel of several congressional committees — reveals not only that Bush’s critics are closer to the mark, but something much more significant: that Saddam wanted and, in some cases, tried to resurrect the weapons programs that he had built in the 1980s, but that the United Nations sanctions and inspections prevented him from doing so.

More...

KEY QUOTES FROM THE KAY REPORT:

"Multiple sources with varied access and reliability have told ISG [the Iraq Survey Group] that Iraq did not have a large, ongoing centrally controlled CW [chemical weapons] program after 1991."

"Iraq’s large-scale capability to develop, produce, and fill new CW munitions was reduced-if not entirely destroyed-during Operations Desert Storm and Desert Fox [Clinton’s 1998 airstrikes], 13 years of UN sanctions and UN inspections."

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (58 posts)