"And, from what I have read of your posts: Don, Tony, Lindy and anyone else who posts here on the Zone who is against the war or against your innate and unchallenged views of what the universe is and how it operates."

You have obviously chosen to forget previous posts where I specifically stated that I could eventually be proven wrong. I will leave the folks you mentioned opinion of my responses and yours to them, to be expressed or not.

When you refuse to admit that anyone even has an argument, and thereby avoid having your viewpoints tested, then is it true that you might be acting in a cowardly way?

As I stated above I am on record as to the possibility of being wrong can you say the same thing?

If you make adhominem remarks about someone when you know they are false (as tom has done recently to me, and SDAI does to Don, and you have done to Lindy), then is one not being Dishonest?

I rescanned the exchange between you and Tom. Would you care to point out one instance of adhominem against you while you countered with feces, dishonesty, lying, hypocrisy and a couple of others that slip my mind. Perhaps you consider the act of disagreeing with you adhominem and what the hell makes you think you can devine when someone make a remark that they know is false.

If you take issue whith those who think that this war was predicated on reasons that were ultimately false and those that think that some accounting should be made, yet you can not provide any evidence even after the war to support the predications- then don't you think leveling the charge of a lack of intellectual integrity might be accurate?

Tom has worn off his fingerprints presenting what he feels is evidence and I even tried to reason with you early on. You dismiss everything without the slightest concession that you might be wrong. You can't be made to open your eyes to another viewpoint. If you are waiting for me to waste my time on you like Tom does, by all means hold your breath.

"You and your ilk here spend a great deal of time pissing on the other side for FALSE reasons. If I dribble on your shoe for TRUE reasons, why are you crying foul?"

"You and your ilk", I love it. (Bowser's illigitimate son)

I am not crying foul. I am just pointing out what a prig you are. (I suffer no prigs)

"I doubt that. Lindy and I have clashed directly many times- as you tend to ignore."

Once again the point goes sailing right over your head.

Thank god that neither of us is in charge of diplomacy. The world would be a nuclear waste land.