This entire load of crap was hauled up back when Bush was running for governor, and before the 2000 elections. And guess what: it amounted to nothing back then, too, and the smear was squelched based on many of the same documents. Even discounting that, all the evidence necessary to a rational person was available weeks ago.
The Left pulls bullshit out of the air, and hope that if they shout loudly enough about it, the smears will stick. The theory is that a negative "impression" will be left, regardless of what the facts reveal, and unfortunately this is often true. The Left thrives on vagueness, impressions, and uncertainties.
The fly in their ointment now is that they no longer control all of the dissemination of information to the people.
Current Events » in reply to but you didn't know any of this was true before
Yes. He did. So did you, and so did the Democrats.
The whole thread (34 posts)
- Another member of the 187th, Paul Bishop, says the same thing: "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush."
- Like Kevin Drum at Calpundit, Greg is riding this one all the way down to the ground.
- re: Another member of the 187th, Paul Bishop, says the same thing: "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush."
- BTW, do you get the sense GWB is panicking this time?
- Another Tx Guard officer says records "cleansed".
- Calpundit
- what evidence do you have there are witnesses who saw Bush?
- Military Dentist Doesn't Recall Bush
- Do you realize just how absurd that is?
- Its amazng that you can view this as helping your argument, in fact it makes a mokery of it.
- Military Dentist Doesn't Recall Bush
- what evidence do you have there are witnesses who saw Bush?
- Much ado about nothing
- OW.Com Exclusive: Bill Campenni Talks