Current Events » in reply to first we have to see if these future witnesses saw Bush or not

The whole thread (34 posts)

• Another member of the 187th, Paul Bishop, says the same thing: "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush." - Greg - 2/13/2004 2:01:43 AM
  • Like Kevin Drum at Calpundit, Greg is riding this one all the way down to the ground. - Tom Brosz - 2/13/2004 6:14:24 PM
  • re: Another member of the 187th, Paul Bishop, says the same thing: "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush." - gbaikie - 2/13/2004 11:15:19 AM
    • I don't see what point you are making. He said he never saw hide nor hair of Bush. Do you dispute it? (n/t) - Greg - 2/13/2004 11:20:39 AM
      • I can't even recall the the names of those I spend Basic training with - Justin Kelly - 2/13/2004 4:00:11 PM
        • re: I can't even recall the the names of those I spend Basic training with - Greg - 2/14/2004 2:36:18 AM
          • Turn on the TV, all records were released today (n/t) - Justin Kelly - 2/14/2004 3:48:40 AM
  • BTW, do you get the sense GWB is panicking this time? - Bowser - 2/13/2004 6:03:58 AM
  • Another Tx Guard officer says records "cleansed". - Bowser - 2/13/2004 5:54:41 AM
    • Boston Globe: "Doubts Raised on Bush Accuser" - Larry J - 2/13/2004 3:56:22 PM
  • Calpundit - Tom Brosz - 2/13/2004 5:28:17 AM
    • what evidence do you have there are witnesses who saw Bush? - Greg - 2/13/2004 6:17:43 AM
      • Military Dentist Doesn't Recall Bush - Greg - 2/13/2004 7:00:41 AM
        • Do you realize just how absurd that is? - Larry J - 2/13/2004 3:32:21 PM
          • you misread the thread, that was just the heading of an article - Greg - 2/14/2004 2:38:38 AM
            • Which has already been adressed by gbaike (and you ignored it) - Justin Kelly - 2/14/2004 3:46:30 AM
              • re: Which has already been adressed by gbaike (and you ignored it) - Greg - 2/14/2004 6:45:43 AM
                • re: Which has already been adressed by gbaike (and you ignored it) - gbaikie - 2/15/2004 4:31:44 AM
                • ok, fair enough - just watched the second inteview - Justin Kelly - 2/14/2004 7:25:23 AM
                  • but you didn't know any of this was true before - Greg - 2/14/2004 8:06:13 AM
                    • Yes. He did. So did you, and so did the Democrats. - Tom Brosz - 2/14/2004 10:59:59 PM
                      • well, now we know a little more - Greg - 2/16/2004 11:54:54 AM
                        • You don't act like you've learned anything - Tom Brosz - 2/16/2004 8:13:53 PM
        • Its amazng that you can view this as helping your argument, in fact it makes a mokery of it. - Justin Kelly - 2/13/2004 7:12:37 AM
          • re: Its amazng that you can view this as helping your argument, in fact it makes a mokery of it. - Greg - 2/13/2004 8:16:46 AM
            • what sill happen is that you will ignore any future witnesses like you are the current ones (n/t) - Justin Kelly - 2/13/2004 3:51:29 PM
              • first we have to see if these future witnesses saw Bush or not (n/t) - Greg - 2/14/2004 2:40:17 AM
                • again, turn on the news or go to CNN, they just interviewed the individual he reported to (n/t) - Justin Kelly - 2/14/2004 3:53:42 AM
  • Much ado about nothing - Donald - 2/13/2004 3:22:48 AM
    • Please, that's Mr. John Kerry to you (n/t) - FrankC - 2/13/2004 5:54:25 PM
    • Are you stating that service under combat conditions is now a criteria for being President? - Tom Brosz - 2/13/2004 5:07:56 AM
    • re: Much ado about nothing - Greg - 2/13/2004 3:58:47 AM
      • I suspect that... - Donald - 2/13/2004 4:39:07 AM
  • OW.Com Exclusive: Bill Campenni Talks - Greg - 2/13/2004 2:18:01 AM