Are you stating that service under combat conditions is now a criteria for being President?

Current Events » in reply to Much ado about nothing

Are you stating that service under combat conditions is now a criteria for being President?

Tom Brosz — 2/13/2004 5:07:56 AM (archived)

Of course, we are overlooking Kerry's long efforts to cripple the military and intelligence capacity of America at almost every opportunity in the Senate.

The whole thread (34 posts)

Another member of the 187th, Paul Bishop, says the same thing: "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush." - Greg - 2/13/2004 2:01:43 AM
- Like Kevin Drum at Calpundit, Greg is riding this one all the way down to the ground. - Tom Brosz - 2/13/2004 6:14:24 PM
- re: Another member of the 187th, Paul Bishop, says the same thing: "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush." - gbaikie - 2/13/2004 11:15:19 AM
  - I don't see what point you are making. He said he never saw hide nor hair of Bush. Do you dispute it? (n/t) - Greg - 2/13/2004 11:20:39 AM
    - I can't even recall the the names of those I spend Basic training with - Justin Kelly - 2/13/2004 4:00:11 PM
      - re: I can't even recall the the names of those I spend Basic training with - Greg - 2/14/2004 2:36:18 AM
        
        Turn on the TV, all records were released today (n/t) - Justin Kelly - 2/14/2004 3:48:40 AM
- BTW, do you get the sense GWB is panicking this time? - Bowser - 2/13/2004 6:03:58 AM
- Another Tx Guard officer says records "cleansed". - Bowser - 2/13/2004 5:54:41 AM
  - Boston Globe: "Doubts Raised on Bush Accuser" - Larry J - 2/13/2004 3:56:22 PM
- Calpundit - Tom Brosz - 2/13/2004 5:28:17 AM
  - what evidence do you have there are witnesses who saw Bush? - Greg - 2/13/2004 6:17:43 AM
    - Military Dentist Doesn't Recall Bush - Greg - 2/13/2004 7:00:41 AM
      - Do you realize just how absurd that is? - Larry J - 2/13/2004 3:32:21 PM
        
        you misread the thread, that was just the heading of an article - Greg - 2/14/2004 2:38:38 AM
        
        Which has already been adressed by gbaike (and you ignored it) - Justin Kelly - 2/14/2004 3:46:30 AM
        
        re: Which has already been adressed by gbaike (and you ignored it) - Greg - 2/14/2004 6:45:43 AM
        
        re: Which has already been adressed by gbaike (and you ignored it) - gbaikie - 2/15/2004 4:31:44 AM
        
        ok, fair enough - just watched the second inteview - Justin Kelly - 2/14/2004 7:25:23 AM
        
        but you didn't know any of this was true before - Greg - 2/14/2004 8:06:13 AM
        
        Yes. He did. So did you, and so did the Democrats. - Tom Brosz - 2/14/2004 10:59:59 PM
        
        well, now we know a little more - Greg - 2/16/2004 11:54:54 AM
        
        You don't act like you've learned anything - Tom Brosz - 2/16/2004 8:13:53 PM
      - Its amazng that you can view this as helping your argument, in fact it makes a mokery of it. - Justin Kelly - 2/13/2004 7:12:37 AM
        
        re: Its amazng that you can view this as helping your argument, in fact it makes a mokery of it. - Greg - 2/13/2004 8:16:46 AM
        
        what sill happen is that you will ignore any future witnesses like you are the current ones (n/t) - Justin Kelly - 2/13/2004 3:51:29 PM
        
        first we have to see if these future witnesses saw Bush or not (n/t) - Greg - 2/14/2004 2:40:17 AM
        
        again, turn on the news or go to CNN, they just interviewed the individual he reported to (n/t) - Justin Kelly - 2/14/2004 3:53:42 AM
- Much ado about nothing - Donald - 2/13/2004 3:22:48 AM
  - Please, that's Mr. John Kerry to you (n/t) - FrankC - 2/13/2004 5:54:25 PM
  - Are you stating that service under combat conditions is now a criteria for being President? - Tom Brosz - 2/13/2004 5:07:56 AM
  - re: Much ado about nothing - Greg - 2/13/2004 3:58:47 AM
    - I suspect that... - Donald - 2/13/2004 4:39:07 AM
- OW.Com Exclusive: Bill Campenni Talks - Greg - 2/13/2004 2:18:01 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (34 posts)